September 11, 2009, Author: Shawn, 3 Comments

Public Nuisance- Cathedral City, CA bans the brands!

Categories: Branding, Cuttings, Site Updates
Tags:: , , , , ,

bologna Public Nuisance  Cathedral City, CA bans the brands!Photo of Mikey Collins by Jared Anderson.

If your travel plans will take you through Cathedral City, California and you find yourself wanting a new scar; be warned: City officials have declared scarification a “public nuisance” and have banned it along with other extreme body modifications.

The ban, which passed 4-0* (with Councilman Paul Marchand abstaining) was spearheaded by Councilman Greg Pettis and has been put in place as “pre-emptive measure to maintain the health and safety of the community”.

The community, which boasts a single shop offering scarification/branding, will no doubt sleep safer tonight due to the efforts of Mister Pettis and the members of the Council.

Pettis voted against a fellow councilman’s attempt to get Cathedral City’s medical marijuana dispensaries banned in April of 2009.

Regulation is inevitable on a local and national level. While cutting/branding still is still a very small part of commercially available body modification practices it will no doubt be included with the much more common Body Piercing/Tattoo regulations. I would have liked to see Pettis and his fellow Councilmembers spend the extra time in talking with the lone shop that provides this service on how to set minimum standards in place. Perhaps Greg Pettis and Cathedral City prefer outright bans instead of working on solutions that allow it’s citizens the right to do to their bodies what they see fit.

You have to wonder what’s next?

* There are conflicting reports on the final vote. Mydesert.com has the vote at 4-0, with Daylife.com reporting 3-1.

share save 171 16 Public Nuisance  Cathedral City, CA bans the brands!

3 Responses to Public Nuisance- Cathedral City, CA bans the brands!

  1. Mandic says:

    Woah Jared, that isn’t a body modification, it is California.

  2. admin says:

    I’m not against regulation; far from it.
    It just seems that Greg (I can almost guarantee that Paul doesn’t have a wife/girlfriend) could have either:

    A. Dealt with more important social issues.
    B. Worked WITH the local shop that does it instead of going right for the ban.

    Typical.

    -shawn

  3. no1uno says:

    How non-judgmental of them. I bet all the councilmen’s wives have fake tits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>